How to critically review a research paper

own assessments by making me personally accountable. Are the reported analyses appropriate? I look for specific indicators of research quality, asking myself questions such as: Are the background literature and study rationale clearly articulated? This is usually based on specific criteria. Check all calculations and presentation of data. The second part, "Writing your Critique discusses two possible ways to structure your critique truth or consequences trading paper paper. To answer these questions look at review articles to nd out how reviewers see this piece of research. If I'm pointing out a problem or concern, I substantiate it enough so that the authors cant say, Well, that's not correct or That's not fair. . So now, I only sign my reviews so as to be fully transparent on the rare occasions when I suggest that the authors cite papers of mine, which I only do when my work will remedy factual errors or correct the claim that something has. Basically, I am looking to see if the research question is well motivated; if the data are sound; if the analyses are technically correct; and, most importantly, if the findings support the claims made in the paper. Here you decide the strengths and weaknesses of a text. Did the research produce any practical applications? McGlynn, first, I read a printed version to get an overall impression.

Best quality photo printer paper How to critically review a research paper

Use the review article to select a research article. As that indirectly shows whether the authors have a good knowledge of the field. Article, writing the review itself generally takes less than an 4th grade research paper template hour. What was the objective of the study. Reviewing is a great learning experience and an exciting thing.

Writing a critical review of a journal article can help to improve your research skills.By assessing the work of others, you develop skills as a critical reader and become familiar with the types of evaluation criteria that will be applied to research in your eld and thus your own research.Writing a good review requires expertise in the field, an intimate knowledge of research methods, a critical mind, the ability to give fair and constructive feedback, and sensitivity to the feelings of authors on the receiving end.

I never use value judgments or valueladen adjectives. There are occasions where you get extremely exciting papers that you might be tempted to share with your colleagues. I evaluate whether the methodology used is appropriate. Finally, i am more willing to review phd programs in germany taught in english for journals that I read or publish. Wong Bear in mind that one of the most dangerous traps a reviewer can fall into is failing to recognize and acknowledge their own bias. Purpose of a critical review, and Iapos, i will turn down requests if the paper is too far removed from my own research areas. E Chambers It is necessary to maintain decorum.

After that, I check whether all the experiments and data make sense, paying particular attention to whether the authors carefully designed and performed the experiments and whether they analyzed and interpreted the results in a comprehensible way.Is there an angle the authors have overlooked?Is the statistical analysis sound and justified?